Coastal LiDAR

From Wildsong
Jump to navigationJump to search

Santa Clara county

For this project I want to closely examine a reach of road that goes into the hills to see if it can accommodate addition of a footpath.

I downloaded data that was collected by the Santa Clara Water District in 2006. The area of interest is small, covered by 4 tiles. See https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/lidar1_z/geoid12a/data/4870/ The data is in LAZ format.

What coordinate system is this data in? It's in WGS84 and the vertical unit is 1 meter.

First thing I want to do is generate simple first return and last return surfaces.

The files are already classified, see the metadata:

"This data set is an LAZ (compressed LAS) format file containing LIDAR point cloud data. LAS format files, raw LiDAR data in its native format, classified bare-earth LiDAR DEM and photogrammetrically derived breaklines generated from LiDAR Intensity stereo-pairs. Breakline, Top of Bank, and contour files in ESRI personal geodatabase format, Microstation V8 .dgn format, and AutoCAD 2004 formats for the San Jose Phase 3 project of Santa Clara County, Ca. This project arrived with only unclassified data. NOAAs Office for Coastal Management performed an automated classification using lasground. Although class 1 and class 2 are available, there was no QA/QC on the points after lasground was performed."


Generating surfaces from raw data For ArcGIS this means "terrains". For QGIS it means DEM rasters. I am starting with terrains, which means first I need to get the data out of the LAZ files and into ArcGIS. I installed the lastools into ArcGIS already, let's see what I have in there.

http://www.spatialguru.com/lidar-data-to-raster-file-with-open-source-gdal-tool/

http://www.cs.unc.edu/~isenburg/lastools/ See the README files for details on each tool.

In the order I might use them in my tool chain:

lasmerge : Merge my tiles into one LAS file. lasmerge -i *.las -o out.las

lasclip : Clip the data to a polygon. Most of one of the tiles is outside my study area, so I should get rid of that data. Except processing the full 4 tiles is so fast that it does not matter!

lasground : tool for bare earth extraction (class=2 : ground, class=1 not ground)

las2dem : Make a TIN then make a raster from the TIN.

This is interesting too.

lastrack : Generates profile along a GPS track.

Setting step size will help remove buildings. Default is 5m, try -town or -city or -metro as options.

Vertical unit can be meters (the default) or else try "-feet".

For steep hills try "-fine" or "-extra_fine"

lasinfo (160710) report for D:\GISData\CA\SantaClara\LAH_merged.laz
reading 'D:\GISData\CA\SantaClara\LAH_merged.laz' with 13366138 points
reporting all LAS header entries:
  file signature:             'LASF'
  file source ID:             0
  global_encoding:            0
  project ID GUID data 1-4:   00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
  version major.minor:        1.1
  system identifier:          'LAStools (c) by rapidlasso GmbH'
  generating software:        'lasmerge (version 160710)'
  file creation day/year:     1/1970
  header size:                227
  offset to point data:       387
  number var. length records: 2
  point data format:          1
  point data record length:   28
  number of point records:    13366138
  number of points by return: 11562914 1709526 92895 803 0
  scale factor x y z:         0.0000001 0.0000001 0.001
  offset x y z:               0 0 0
  min x y z:                  -122.1056002 37.3255269 -795.944
  max x y z:                  -122.0878199 37.3532182 971.289
variable length header record 1 of 2:
  reserved             43707
  user ID              'NOAA_CSC'
  record ID            129
  length after header  2
  description          'Sort Order'
variable length header record 2 of 2:
  reserved             43707
  user ID              'LASF_Projection'
  record ID            34735
  length after header  48
  description          'Projection Parameters'
    GeoKeyDirectoryTag version 1.1.0 number of keys 5
      key 1024 tiff_tag_location 0 count 1 value_offset 2 - GTModelTypeGeoKey: ModelTypeGeographic
      key 2048 tiff_tag_location 0 count 1 value_offset 4269 - GeographicTypeGeoKey: GCS_NAD83
      key 2054 tiff_tag_location 0 count 1 value_offset 9102 - GeogAngularUnitsGeoKey: Angular_Degree
      key 4096 tiff_tag_location 0 count 1 value_offset 5103 - VerticalCSTypeGeoKey: VertCS_North_American_Vertical_Datum_1988
      key 4099 tiff_tag_location 0 count 1 value_offset 9001 - VerticalUnitsGeoKey: Linear_Meter
the header is followed by 2 user-defined bytes
LASzip compression (version 2.4r2 c2 50000): POINT10 2 GPSTIME11 2
reporting minimum and maximum for all LAS point record entries ...
  X          -1221056002 -1220878199
  Y           373255269  373532182
  Z             -795944     971289
  intensity           1       5100
  return_number       1          4
  number_of_returns   1          4
  edge_of_flight_line 0          0
  scan_direction_flag 0          0
  classification      1          2
  scan_angle_rank     0          0
  user_data           0          0
  point_source_ID   294        770
  gps_time 661.683328 602614.538400
number of first returns:        11562914
number of intermediate returns: 93700
number of last returns:         11563016
number of single returns:       9853492
overview over number of returns of given pulse: 9853492 3233170 276260 3216 0 0 0
histogram of classification of points:
         9643729  unclassified (1)
         3722409  ground (2)

Success. lasinfo done.
Completed script lasinfo...
Succeeded at Mon Jul 18 12:11:15 2016 (Elapsed Time: 6.35 seconds)

Gold Beach

20-Apr-2011 Going to Gold Beach for Easter weekend, so naturally I am looking at Curry county data once again.

I have a nice NAIP 2009 photo of the area now. 1/2 meter 2009 county level files are available as zipped files via FTP from Oregon Explorer

Working with LiDAR obtained from the Oregon Coastal Atlas

Holes in LiDAR data

I have created a contour and a hillshade, which is great, but the LiDAR is full of holes! I think since it's a coastal dataset (NOAA) they don't care about the areas up a bit from the beach.

I am thinking I can fill the holes with 10m DEM data, so I found an example on how to do this and will look at it this evening.

http://blogs.esri.com/Support/blogs/mappingcenter/archive/2009/06/16/Filling-and-clipping-a-raster.aspx